PROBLEMATIKA PENEGAKKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PENGGUNA NARKOBA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 214/PID.SUS/2024/PN.MDN)

PROBLEMATIKA PENEGAKKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PENGGUNA NARKOBA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 214/PID.SUS/2024/PN.MDN), Law Enforcement, Drug Abuse...

Author: Roslina Tiur Melia
Date: 2025
Keywords: Law Enforcement, Drug Abuse
Type: Jurnal
Category: penelitian

Because it can harm the nation's values, the government views the distribution and usage of drugs as one of the major national issues. Drug offenders frequently receive punishments based on court rulings that fall short of providing a sense of justice and legal clarity. Articles 114, 112, and 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics are among the provisions that are frequently utilized to trap offenders in drug-related crimes. Two of the three articles— Article 112 and Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 regulating Narcotics—are subject to various interpretations and ambiguous wording. As a result of the articles' multiple interpretations, drug dealers and other criminals will pretend to be victims of drug-related crimes. that this will affect the imposition of short sentences, leading to unfairness in the process of implementation. The data and facts gathered by examining court rulings pertaining to criminal penalties against drug offenders and connecting them to relevant laws and regulations constitute the normative legal nature of this research, which is a method that describes or explains a fact in a methodical manner. According to the study's findings, this appears to be far more challenging in the realm of drug law enforcement. It appears that our law enforcement is ingrained in prioritizing criminal consequences. On a local, national, and worldwide scale, extraordinary encouragement is required. Regarding the case under investigation, the judge of the Medan District Court found the defendant legally and convincingly guilty in accordance with Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The defendant, Veri Suriana, also known as Veri, was sentenced to six (six) years in prison and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000, - (one billion rupiah), with the clause that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with a six-month prison sentence.

Files:
Tidak ada data !

Collections:
Digital Library UNPAB